Trouble downloading? go to for stories without videos

At age five, 1954, "the Bishop" (Card. Stritch) stood over me and said, "Stop babbling about what Father Horne did to you." It took me 40 years to talk about it again. Now, I babble. - ke
**********The City of Angels is Everywhere*********
in 2009 our ongoing coverage of the pedophile epidemic in the Catholic Church will be at City fAngels5. in 2010 at CityofAngels8

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Do you Doubt the release of Doubt was timed to create Doubt in American minds about pedophiles in the Catholic Church?

By Kay Ebeling

Timing of the release of the movie Doubt makes me curious and suspicious, as a person who watches the way the church bends and stretches the truth about pedophiles in the priesthood. Why was the movie Doubt released now, after the country has witnessed a stream of lawsuits judged against the church since 2002. For one, now media such as the Catholic News Service can run a review saying the film Doubt is “a reminder of a dark chapter in the church's recent history.”

Also from the CNS review: “Though sexual misconduct is at the heart of the story, it is the balance between doubt which, forms the principal thematic subtext....” While you try to make sense of that sentence, recognize that as you watch this film, you are in a way being brainwashed to believe what the Catholic Bishops want you to believe... that these rapes are isolated cases and there is doubt whether they even took place.

The release of Doubt in 2008 could have been timed to set the clergy sex crime victim movement back about two decades. Produced by Miramax Films, Doubt presents itself as though the last 20 years of civil and criminal action, concerning close to five thousand priests, just never happened. People will see Doubt and come out thinking maybe there were a few isolated cases of pedophilia in the Catholic Church, but there is still doubt.

In 2008 we know the crimes were so widespread, it was like an epidemic of pedophilia among Catholic priests with thousands of American crime victims who have not truly seen justice. Most of the crimes involve serial sodomy and other ways of penetration with pre-pubescent children.

So why would Miramax put this film out now? The title gives it away. I'm paranoid enough to think that PR consultants of the bishop met with Miramax executives to clinch the deal,

To once again create doubt in American viewers' minds.

I would not be surprised if the Bishops through their PR firms arranged the release of Doubt at this time to create Doubt in American audiences. To make it appear that these felonies were one or two isolated cases with no other precedent, and no one ever really knowing for sure if the abuse even took place.

Exactly what the bishops want Americans to think.

Releasing Doubt in 2008 is as if in the 1970s, after humans had gotten to the moon and back and found out it is indeed uninhabited, someone put out a serious sci fi thriller about a race of creatures on the moon.

The release of Doubt makes this viewer feel like the past ten years of discovery and priests being convicted of serial sodomy on prepubescent children never happened, or at least the powers that be at Miramax would like everyone to think they never happened. . .

"Less than 1 percent present questionable narratives"

Udo Strutynski had this to say about Doubt:

As a survivor of childhood clerical sex abuse, I have advocated justice from the Catholic Church for my fellow survivors these past six-plus years. I should add I am also a lawyer, and trained in assessing the credibility of plaintiffs.

During this time I have personally come to know nearly 300 persons molested by priests, nuns, seminarians, brothers, and the like. Of that number, less than one per cent presented questionable narratives. And when diocesan documents were finally pried loose by persistent judges, even those doubts were quashed by the stark, unambiguous evidence of admissions and clinical conclusions in episcopal files.

In light of my experience, I can say that doubt of the accused predator's guilt rarely emerges as a defense issue even at the beginning of the process, and almost never survives by the end of the investigation.

So, I am bemused that a play based on the premise of the fundamental, or necessary, uncertainty of just such an accusation should achieve the Pulitzer Prize.

Shanley's thesis flies in the face of a horrific reality supported by overwhelming odds. Moreover, it insults the lifelong pain involuntarily borne by abuse survivors everywhere, and thereby revictimizes them.

It may be that Shanley is merely plying an art that is anecdotal and removed from familiar reality, but in such case, it would be largely irrelevant, and not at all praiseworthy, much less prizeworthy. Methinks this playwright is still very much tied to the apron strings of Mother Church.

Udo S

Lucky for us, Doubt is apparently such a bad movie that not many people will see it or like it, so the church did not get what it wanted from this suspected PR move, releasing the film now to re-create doubt where activists have erased it.

Most the victims I talk to are angry about the release of Doubt, none of us will go see it until it is free, and a boycott of Doubt would be a way to show support for the victims of rape by pedophile Catholic priests.

“The film contains a discreetly handled sexual abuse theme. The USCCB Office for Film & Broadcasting classification is A-III -- adults.”

Wait until people see some of these case files.

Onward. . .

No I am not going to run the trailer as a video here. . .

No comments:

CALL: Target Crimes, LA DA's Office, to report sex crimes in the Catholic Church: Phone: (213) 974-5985

City of Angels Lady